|
February 8, 2007 – For immediate release...
Contacts:
- David McIlwaine, State Chair, 865-310-5905
- Hazel Longstreet, Board Secretary, 901-744-9733
- Bill Howell, Middle TN Org., 615-289-1397
- Tiffany Hartung, East TN Org., 865-684-3715
Coalition renews call for food tax cut following Governor's
address
Food tax cut must be part of any cigarette tax increase, coalition
says
"Tennesseans value hard work and a fair chance at success,"
states Dave McIlwaine, State Chair of Tennesseans for Fair
Taxation (TFT). "But Tennessee's high sales tax, and
especially the sales tax on food, means the chance of success
for some is less fair than for others. If we are to achieve
a broad prosperity in the state, we need to look not just
at how much revenue our state is raising, but how fairly it
raises it."
"Earlier this week, the Governor claimed in his State-of-the-State
address that Tennessee is a low-tax state, but that's just
not the reality for many Tennesseans," states McIlwaine.
"For many, the grocery store check-out line offers a
stark contrast to Tennessee's low-tax image as hard-working
Tennesseans struggle to put food on the family table while
paying the highest food tax in the land. That's just not right
and it's time to change it."
According to a recent analysis from the Institute on Taxation
and Economic Policy (ITEP), a tax-policy research group based
in Washington, Tennessee taxes as a whole are among the nation's
lowest, but it's not low for everyone. "For almost half
of all Tennesseans, the bottom 40% of income-earners, state
and local taxes are actually higher than the national average,"
adds McIlwaine. "It's the upper-middle and higher-income
families that skew the state average downward. In fact, the
top 1% of income earners pay less than half the national average
in state and local taxes."
At the heart of this unequal distribution of taxes is Tennessee's
high sales tax on groceries and other basic necessities. Food
makes up one-fourth of the budget for many low-income families
in Tennessee, and it's a significant portion of the family
budget for many middle-income families as well. For the wealthy,
groceries are less than 5% of their family budget. "Regardless
of how the revenue is spent, a cigarette tax increase without
an offsetting cut in the food tax, as the Governor is proposing,
only works to deepen the inequities of an already unjust tax
system," adds McIlwaine.
TFT is supporting the bi-partisan Food Tax - Cigarette Tax
Swap that will cut the state food tax in half, from 6 to 3%
(the local option tax is not affected), paid for with a 44
cent increase in the state cigarette tax. After the cigarette
tax increase, Tennessee's new cigarette tax of 64 cents a
pack will still be far less than the national average of $1.
Meanwhile, the savings from the reduced food tax will save
every family in Tennessee enough to buy an extra 11 days worth
of groceries, or $160 for a family that spends $500 a month
on groceries.
"There are a lot of things that Gov. Bredesen has done
right, but when it comes to the food tax, he's just plain
wrong and he's out of step with the majority of Tennesseans,"
adds McIlwaine, "We simply cannot support a cigarette
tax increase unless it also includes a significant reduction
in the state food tax. That's the bottom line. We're calling
on state legislators to take the initiative to give Tennesseans
the food tax cut that is long overdue."
State and local
taxes as a percentage of personal income |
Tennessee vs.
US Average for each income group |
|
|
|
Income
Group |
Lowest
20% |
Second
20% |
Middle
20% |
Fourth
20% |
Top
20%, Detailed |
Next
15% |
Next
4% |
Top
1% |
| Tennessee |
11.7% |
10.5% |
8.8% |
7.4% |
6.2% |
4.5% |
3.4% |
| US Average |
11.4% |
10.4% |
9.9% |
9.4% |
8.9% |
8.1% |
7.3% |
| Difference |
0.3% |
0.1% |
-1.1% |
-2.0% |
-2.7% |
-3.6% |
-3.9% |
| Tennessee
state and local taxes as a percentage of personal income
compared the the average of all 50 states. Data from "Who
Pays? A Distributional Analysis of the Tax Systems of
all 50 States, 2nd Edition," from the Institute on
Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), January 2003. |
|